Technology Today (Guest): 9.7.2010
Posted by TED Magazine
on Tuesday, September 07, 2010
Having the Right Inventory in the Right Place at the Right Time
Are You Pushing Or Pulling?
Part 2 of 2
by Howard W. Coleman
In a previous blog, I introduced the concept of “Pulling vs. Pushing” your
inventory and how companies all of the world have been able to address forecast
error in the management of their supply chains, by “listening to what customer
have actually bought”.
The challenge: Modify your DNA and thinking
The challenge really has to do with inaccurate forecasts, variability in
supply, and variability in lead-times. How much control do you really have
over these factors? But, there is one challenge that you do have control over
and that is, where you stock the greater portion of your inventory; is it
“upstream” at your DC/main warehouse? That’s where all your demands are aggregated
- and the greater the aggregation the more accurate the demand forecast. So
with “Pull”, most inventories, except for the required “tarhets” at branch
warehouses, is in the DC/main warehouse. This results in inventory being sent
to branches that need it the most, only when the need exists.
So what? Well, variability is less, so target inventory will be less. This
particular “Pull Principle” fosters reducing shortages of inventory, more
rapid response to short term changes in demand, and improving service levels
and keeping inventory balanced among your locations.
So what does this mean for a distributor?
Normally, inventory is “Pushed” to a distributor who is encouraged to purchase
large purchase orders from a supplier. Typically, there are incentives for
large orders, quantity discounts and lower or prepaid transportation costs.
Cash gets tied up, inventory stays in the distributor’s warehouses longer
increasing inventory carrying costs, potentially increasing obsolescence,
and the risk of declining prices (particularly with commodities). Ultimately
there may be declining profits, as a result, but often not recognized until
later accounting periods when the actions taken previously finally come to
light.
With “Pull”, distributors foster the opportunity to share sales/demand data
with their suppliers, maybe even helping their supplier to smooth their production
and decrease their response time (lead time). Distributors may commit to their
suppliers to take specific quantities of inventory, over a specific period,
but in smaller, more frequent shipments. This result is distributors holding
less inventory. These differences and links - using consumption rates as opposed
to forecasts - help to overcome those damaging side effects of “Push” systems.
So, there is benefit to all parties in the supply chain. Think of it like
this; unless there is consumption (buying) at the customer level, no one in
the supply chain has “sold”. The possibility of a “direct connection” between
you and your suppliers is intriguing; there are aligned interests – a positive
development.
So keep in mind that the focus of “Pull”, as a solution, involves:
- Less reliance on demand forecasting – more reliance on actual demand
- A more centralized warehousing of inventory
- More frequent replenishment - a reduction in re-order lead time
- “Target inventory” maintenance
By the way, no one has to buy any new software to “Pull”. What is required
may in fact be somewhat more difficult; a different way of thinking….and behaving.
Better yet, from a competitive position, is that few distributors and only
some manufacturers know about and understand “Pull”. However, within a few
years, most certainly will and be on their way to implementation. So what
should you be doing now about your supply chain and competitive advantage
agenda?
Howard W. Coleman, principal, MCA Associates,
provides management consulting for wholesale distribution and manufacturing
companies that are seeking operational excellence. Reach him at 203.732.0603,
or hcoleman@mcaassociates.com.
Leave a comment